³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥NµæÀn¦å²G©Êª¬¤§¤ñ¸û

§õµÏºa(1)(3)¡@¨H²K´I(2)¡@«¸©µ¦~(2)

¦¬¥ó¤é´Á¡G87¦~4¤ë27¤é¡F±µ¨ü¤é´Á¡G87¦~7¤ë6¤é

ºK­n¡GµæÀn¨Ì50¶gÄÖ³J´ß±j«×¶i¦æÂù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¡A±´°Q°ª¡B§C³J´ß±j«×¨â«~¨tÀn°¦¦å²G©Êª¬¤§®t²§¡Cµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡A°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦30¦Ü80¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡ªº³J´ß±j«×¤Î50¦Ü80¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡³J­«§¡ÅãµÛ°ª©ó§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¡AµM80¶gÄÖ×H°©¤¤¦Ç¤À¡B¶t¤ÎÁC§t¶q¡A¨â«~¨t¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦11¶gÄ֮ɡA¦å¼ß¤¤Åã¥Ü¸û°ªªºÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê©M¸û§CªºÁ`¶t¿@«×¡A²£³J´Á¶¡¡]30¡ã50¶gÄÖ¡^¥H°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¸û°ª¡AµM14¶gÄ֤β£³J´Á¶¡¦å¼ß¤¤µL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¤ÎÁ`¶t¶q¡A§¡¥H§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡C8¡B11¤Î14¶gÄÖ¦å²G¤¤pH¡B¤G®ñ¤ÆºÒ¤ÀÀ£¡]pCO2¡^¡B®ñ¤ÀÀ£¡]pO2¡^¡B®ñ¹¡©M«×¡]O2%¡^¡BºÒ»Ä²B®Ú¿@«×¡eHCO3-¡f¨â«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡A²£³J´Á¶¡¦å²G¤¤pCO2¡BpO2¡BO2% ¤ÎCa++¡BK+¡BNa+ ¿@«×¡A¨â«~¨t¶¡¥çµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡ApH«h©ó40¶gÄ֮ɰª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÅãµÛªº¸û§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡A¦Ó¡eHCO3-¡f«h©ó30¤Î50¶gÄ֮ɰª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÅãµÛªº¤ñ§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°§C¡C½Õ¾ã¹}³¶t§t¶q¹ï8¤Î11¶gÄÖÀn°¦¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×§¡µLÅãµÛ¼vÅT¡F¦Ó8¶gÄ֮ɡAÁý¹}°ª¶t¡]1.6%¡^¹}³¨Ï¦å²G¡eHCO3-¡f¤U­°¡A11¶gÄÖ®ÉÁý¹}§C¶t¡]0.4%¡^¹}³«h¨Ï¨ä¤W¤É¡C¡]ÃöÁä»y¡GµæÀn¡B¦å²G©Êª¬¡B³J´ß±j«×¡^

¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w

(1)¥xÆW¬Ù¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò©yÄõ¤À©Ò¡A©yÄõ¿¤¤­µ²¶m©u¤ô¸ô28-1¸¹¡C

(2)°ê¥ß¥xÆW¤j¾Ç¯b²£¾Ç¨t¡A¥x¥_¥«°ò¶©¸ô¤T¬q155«Ñ50¸¹¡C

(3)Corresponding author.

ºü  ¨¥

        §C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t³JÂû18¶gÄÖ¥H«á¡A·í¤é³¶t§t¶q±q1% ´£°ª¦Ü3.5% ®É¡A¦å¼ß¶tÂ÷¤l¿@«×©MÁ`¶t¶q©úÅ㪺¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡]Combs et al., 1979¡^¡C«p´ß³J¤ñÁ¡´ß³J¤§¥ÀÂû¦³¸û°ªªº¦å¼ß¶t¿@«×¡]Wideman and Buss, 1985¡^¡CGrunder et al.¡]1980¡^¤ñ¸û¸g7¥N³J´ß­«¦Ê¤À¤ñ¿ï©Þ¤§¥ÀÂû«ü¥X¡A¦å²M¤¤µ²¦X©Ê¶t§t¶q¡A«p´ß³J«~¨tÅãµÛªº°ª©óÁ¡´ß³J«~¨t¡]¤À§O¬°26.8¤Î15.6 mg/dL¡^¡A¦Óvitellogeninªº¶q¡A«p´ß³J«~¨t¡]3.8 mg/ml¡^¥çÅãµÛªº°ª©óÁ¡´ß³J«~¨t¡]1.8 mg/ml¡^¡A¦Ó¥H¦Ù¦×ª`®g10 mg 17£]-estradiol benzoate¡A¹ï¦å²M¤¤´åÂ÷©Ê¶t¿@«×¤§¼vÅT¨â«~¨t¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡AµM¦bµ²¦X©Ê¶t§t¶q¤Îvitellogenin¿@«×¤è­±¡A«p´ß³J«~¨t¼W¥[ªº¶qÅãµÛªº°ª©óÁ¡´ß³J«~¨t¡CBuss et al.¡]1980¡^¤ñ¸û«p¡BÁ¡´ß³J¨â«~¨t¤§§¿²G¤¤¶t¿@«×«ü¥X¡AµL½×¤l®c¤¤¦³µL³J´ß§Î¦¨¡A¨ä§¿¤¤¶t¿@«×¤§Åܤƨâ«~¨t§¡µL©úÅ㤣¦P¡A¦ý¤l®c¤¤¦³³J´ß§Î¦¨¤§¥ÀÂû¡AµL½×«p´ß³J«~¨t©ÎÁ¡´ß³J«~¨tÂû°¦¡A§¡©úÅ㪺¤ñµL³J´ß§Î¦¨ªÌ§C¡C

        ²£³J®a¸V³J´ß«~½è¦nÃa¼vÅT¦¬¯qªº°ª§C¡A¦]¬°³J´ß«~½è®tªÌ¯}·l²v°ª¡A¯}·lªº´ß³J»ù­È§C¡C¾ÚWashburn¡]1982¡^¦ô­p¡A³JÂû±q²£¤U³J¨ì±N³J°e¨ì®ø¶OªÌ¤â¤¤¡A¨ä¤¤¶¡¹Lµ{¬ù¦³6¡ã8% ªº¯}·l²v¡C¦Ó®a¸V¦~ÄÖ¥ç·|¼vÅT³J´ß«~½è¤§¦nÃa¡A¨Ó¯èÂû³J´ß±j«×¥Ñ25¶gÄ֮ɤ§3.53 kg­°¨ì65¶gÄÖªº2.83 kg ¡]Izat et al., 1985¡^¡AµæÀn¥ç¥Ñ30¶gÄÖªº4.0 kg­°¨ì80¶gÄÖªº2.8 kg¡]§õµ¥¡A1991¡^¡C¹ï³JÀn¦Ó¨¥¡A¨ä¥Í²£¤§³J¥D­n¥Î©ó¥Ö³J¤§»s³y¡A¦Ó­ì®Æ³J³J´ß«~½è¼vÅT¥Ö³J»s¦¨²v¬Æ¹d¡A¦]¦¹¦p¦ó§ïµ½³JÀn²£³J«á´Á¤§³J´ß«~½è¬O¨è¤£®e½wªº½ÒÃD¡Cªñ¦~¨Ó¥Ñ©óÀô«O·NÃѪº°ªº¦¡A¶Ç²Î¤è¦¡§Q¥Îªe¤t¡B¤ô¦À¾iÀn¡A±Æªnª«³y¦¨¤ô·½¦Ã¬V¤§°ÝÃD¹ð¨ü«ü³d¡C¬°¸Ñ¨M¶Ç²Îªe¤t¡B¤ô¦À¾iÀn¦Ã¬V¤§°ÝÃD¦Ó±À¦æ¤§Å¢¹}¦Û°Ê¤Æ¹}¾i¼Ò¦¡¡A±`¦]²£³J«á´Á³J´ß¯}·l²v¼W¥[¦Ó¨Ï·~ªÌ»q¨¬¤£«e¡C­Y¯àÂǥѦU¶µ¬ã¨s¡A¦³®Äªº§ï¶iÅ¢¹}Àn°¦²£³J«á´Á³J´ß«~½èÄY­«¤U­°¤§°ÝÃD¡A´î¤Ö³J´ß¯}·l²v¡A«K¯à¶¶§Q±À¦æ¦Û°Ê¤ÆµL¦Ã¬V¤§³JÀn¹}¾i¼Ò¦¡¡A¸Ñ¨MÀô«O°ÝÃD¨Ã´£°ª¸gÀٮįq¡C¥»¸ÕÅç°£´ú©w³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥NµæÀn¤§²£³J©Ê¯à¤Î³J´ß«~½è¥~¡A¨Ã¥H±´°Q°ª¡B§C¤è¦V¿ï©Þ«~¨t¦b¥Íªø»P²£³J´Á¶¡¦å²G©Êª¬¤§®t²§©Ê¬°¥D­n¸ÕÅç¥Øªº¡C

§÷®Æ»P¤èªk

¤@. ¸ÕÅç°Êª«¤Î¹}¾iºÞ²z

        ¥xÆW¬Ù¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò©yÄõ¤À©Ò²{¦³¤§µæÀnL1051¡BL1052¡BL1053¤ÎL1054¥|­Ó¨t¡A¨ä¨Ó·½©M¿ï©Þ¤èªk¦p§õµ¥¡]1992¡^©Ò­z¡A¤ÀªR¥|­Ó¨t²Ä6¥NÀn°¦50¶gÄÖ³J´ß±j«×¡A¨Ì¶¯¿Ë®a±Ú¡]sire family¡^¥­§¡­È¤§Åܲ§µ{«×¡A¿ï¨ä¤¤°ª§C®t²§¸û¤j¤§L1053¬°¿Ë¥N±Ú¸s¡]ªí1¡^¡A¦¹¿Ë¥N±Ú¸s¤§³J´ß±j«×«e¤T¦W¤§®a±Ú¡]¨Ì¶¯¿Ë®a±Ú¥­§¡¡^¬°°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¡A³J´ß±j«×³Ì«á¤T¦W¤§®a±Ú¬°§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¡C«~¨t¤º°tºØÁc´Þ¤§²Ä¤@¥N¥ÀÂú¦@¨â§å¦¸¡A¨C§å¦¸¬Û¹j¤@¶g¹å¥X¡A¨C­Ó¨t¦U110°¦¡Cªì¥Í¦Ü2¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡¡A¹}¾i©ó°ª¬[¶ì½¦ºôª¬¨|ÂúÄæ¡]3.5¡Ñ3 m¡^¡A¥H125 W «O·Å¿O«O·Å¡A3¶gÄÖ¦Ü6¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡¹}¾i©ó¤ì®h¹Ô®ÆÀnªÙ¡A6¶gÄÖ¥H«á«h²¾¦Ü¦³¤ô¦À¡]4.5¡Ñ2.5¡Ñ0.15 m¡^¤Î¤ôªd¹B°Ê³õ¤§¥b¶}©ñ¦¡ÀnªÙ¡]15¡Ñ8 m¡^¡C12¶gÄ֮ɲ¾¤J²£³JÀnªÙ¤§­Ó§OÀnÅ¢¹}¾i¡A¥ú·Ó®É¶¡©T©w¬°16¤p®É¡]04¡G00¡ã20¡G00¡^¡A¸ÕÅç©óÀn°¦¹F80¶gÄ֮ɵ²§ô¡C

¤G. ¸ÕÅç¹}³¤Î³B²z

        ¹}³Àç¾i¿@«×¤À¤T­Ó¶¥¬q¡]ªí2¡^¡A1¡ã4 ¶gÄÖ¬°¨|Âú´Á¡A5¡ã16¶gÄÖ¬°¨|¦¨´Á¡A16¶gÄÖ¥H«á³vº¥§ó´«¬°²£³JÀn®Æ¡A¦Ü17¶gÄÖ¥H«á«h§¹¥þ¹}¤©²£³JÀn®Æ¡C©ó7¶gÄ֮ɨC«~¨t¦U¥b¤§Àn°¦¡]³B²z²Õ¡^ Áý¤©°ª¶t¡]1.6%¡^¹}³¤@¶g¡A10¶gÄÖ®ÉÁý¤©§C¶t¡]0.4%¡^¹}³¤@¶g¡A¥t¥~¥b¼Æ¤§Àn°¦¡]¹ï·Ó²Õ¡^«hÁý¤©¥¿±`¶t±À¯ò¶q¡]0.8%¡^¤§¹}³¡C°£¦]°t¦X±Ä¦å«e¸T­¹4¤p®É¥~¡A¸ÕÅç´Á¶¡Àn°¦§¡¦Û¥Ñ±Ä­¹¹}®Æ¤Î¶¼¤ô¡AµM©ó40¤Î50¶gÄֱĦå«e¥¼¤©¸T­¹¡C

¤T. ¸ê®Æ¤§¦¬¶°¤Î¦å²G¼Ë«~¤ÀªR

        ©ó8¡B11¡B14¡B20¡B30¡B40¡B50¶gÄ֮ɶi¦æ±Ä¦å¡A±Ä¦å®É¶¡©T©w¬°15¡G00¡F²£³J´Á¶¡¡]20¡ã50¶gÄÖ¡^«h¶È´N·í¤Ñ¤U¤È¤l®c¤¤¦³³J¤§¥ÀÀn¶i¦æ±Ä¦å¡C¦å¼Ë¤§³B²z¤Î¦å²G»ÄÆP­È¤§´ú©w¡A¦p§õµ¥¡]1997¡^ ©Ò­z¤§¤èªk¡A30¡B40¡B50¶gÄ֮ɨæP®É´ú©w¦å²G¤¤Ca++¡BK+¡BNa+ ¿@«×¡]Ciba-Corning, 288 Blood Gas System¡^¡C¦å¼ß¼Ë«~«h¤À§O¥H­ì¤l§l¥úÃлö¡]Hitachi, Z-6100¡^´ú©w¶t§t¶q¡A¥H¥ú¹q¤ñ¦â­p¡]Jasco, V-550¡^¨ÌLinhardt and Walter¡]1964¡^©Ò­z¤§¤èªk´ú©wÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡A¨ÌChen et al.¡]1956¡^©Ò­z¤§¤èªk´ú©wµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¡C¸ÕÅç´Á¶¡¨C¤Ñ§@­Ó§O²£³J°O¿ý¡A²Î­p¦U¶¥¬q¤§²£³J¼Æ¤Î²£³J²v¡A¨Ã©ó20¤Î40¶gÄ֮ɯ¯¨ú¦UÀn°¦Åé­«¡C30¡ã80¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡¨C¹j10¶g´ú³J­«¤Î³J´ß±j«×¡]¥°¹F»ö¾¹¤½¥q¡AHT8335PM««ª½±i¤O´ú©w¾¹¡^¡A¨C¦¸³sÄò5¤Ñ¡C¸ÕÅçµ²§ô®É¡]80¶gÄÖ¡^¨C«~¨t¦U¨ú20°¦¥ÀÀn±O®_¡A´ú©w×H°©¦Ç¤À¶q¡C

ªí1.¡@¦U¨t¤Î¨ä¶¯¿Ë®a±Ú¥­§¡¤§50¶gÄÖ³J´ß±j«×

Table 1. Eggshell strength at 50 weeks of age by sire family in each line

¶µ      ¥Ø Item ¨t§O Lines
L1051 L1052 L1053 L1054
¥þ¨t Line overall

    Àn°¦¼Æ No. of ducks

    ³J´ß±j«× Eggshell strength (kg)

        ¥­§¡ Mean

        ¼Ð·Ç°¾®t SD

¡@

73

¡@

3.66

0.75

¡@

74

¡@

3.51

0.74

¡@

73

¡@

3.74

0.74

¡@

74

¡@

3.52

0.75

¶¯¿Ë®a±Ú Sire family

¥­§¡³J´ß±j«× (kg) Average eggshell strength

³Ì°ª¤TªÌ The highest 3

    ®a±Ú 1 Family 1

    ®a±Ú 2 Family 2

    ®a±Ú 3 Family 3

³Ì§C¤TªÌ The lowest 3

    ®a±Ú 1 Family 1

    ®a±Ú 2 Family 2

    ®a±Ú 3 Family 3

¡@

4.21

3.91

3.86

¡@

3.11

3.30

3.37

¡@

3.83

3.80

3.77

¡@

2.86

3.40

3.43

¡@

4.54

4.08

3.86

¡@

2.88

3.21

3.40

¡@

4.14

3.92

3.75

¡@

2.93

3.30

3.32

¥|. ²Î­p¤ÀªR

        ¥»¸ÕÅç±Ä³{¾÷§¹¥þ°Ï¶°³]­p¡A¥H¹å¤Æ§å¦¸¬°°Ï¶°¡A¥Íªø´Á¤§¦å²G©Êª¬¡A¦]8¶gÄÖ¤Î11¶gÄ֮ɶi¦æ¹}³¶t§t¶q¤§½Õ¾ã¡A¬G¤À§O´N¦U¶gÄÖ¶i¦æ¹}³¶t§t¶q»P«~¨t¶¡¤§®ÄÀ³¤ÀªR¡A¨CÀn°¦¤§¦UºØ´ú©w©Êª¬§¡°²³]²Å¦X¤U¦C²Î­p¼Ò¦¡

        Yijkl¡×£g¡ÏBi¡ÏLj¡ÏFk¡Ï(LF)jk¡Ï£`ijkl

¦¡¤¤

        Yijkl¡G¬°²Ä i §å¦¸²Ä j «~¨t²Ä k ºØ¹}³²Ä l °¦¥ÀÀn¤§´ú©w­È¡C

        £g¡GÁ`¥­§¡­È¡C

        Bi¡G²Ä i §å¦¸®ÄÀ³¡A¥B£UBi¡×0¡Ai¡×1¡B2¡C

        Lj¡G²Ä j «~¨t¤§®ÄÀ³¡A¥B£ULj¡×0¡Aj¡×1¡B2¡C

        Fk¡G²Ä k ºØ¹}³¤§®ÄÀ³¡A¥B£UFk¡×0¡Ak¡×1¡B2¬Û·í©ó8¶gÄ֮ɤ§0.8¡B1.6©Î11¶gÄ֮ɤ§0.4¡B0.8% ¹}³¶t§t¶q¡C

        (LF)jk¡G²Ä j «~¨t»P²Ä k ºØ¤é³¤§¥æ·P®ÄÀ³¡C

        £`ijkl¡G³{¾÷®ÄÀ³¡A¥B£`ijkl¡ãNID(0,£m£`2 )¡C

        ¸ÕÅç¸ê®Æ¸gSAS¡]SAS, 1990¡^À³¥Î³nÅ餧¤@¯ë½u©Ê¼Ò¦¡µ{§Ç¶i¦æÅܤè¤ÀªR¡A¥H³Ì¤p¦Û­¼¥­§¡ÀË©w«~¨t¶¡¤Î¹}³¶¡¤§®t²§ÅãµÛ©Ê¡C²£³J´Á¶¡¦U©Êª¬¤§²Î­p¼Ò¦¡¤¤«h¤£§t¹}³®ÄÀ³¡A¶È¤ñ¸û¨â«~¨t¤§®t²§¡C

ªí2.¡@¹}³²Õ¦¨¤À

Table 2. Composition of diets

¦¨                            ¤À

Ingredients

¨|Âú´Á ¨|¦¨´Á ²£³J´Á
0 to 4 wk 5 to 16 wk 7 to 80 wk
------------------------------ (¢H) ------------------------------
¥É  ¦Ì  ¯» Corn meal

¤j  ³Á   ¯» Barley meal

¤j  ¨§  ²Ë, 44% Soybean meal

¾¢¡@¡@¥Ö Wheat bran

²Ê¡@¡@ÁR Rice hull

»Ã  ¥À  ¯» Yeast meal

³½¡@¡@¯» Fish meal

¥Û¦Ç¥Û¯» Limestone, pulverized

ÁC»Ä²B¶t Dicalcium phosphate

½Þ¡@¡@ªo Lard

ºû¥Í¯À¹w²Vª«a Vitamin premixa

Äqª«½è¹w²Vª«b Mineral premixb

¸K  ¤Æ  ÆQ Iodized salt

¥Ò²¸Ói»Ä DL-Methionine

¦X¡@¡@­p Total

­p  ºâ  ­È¡GCalculated value

    ²Ê³J¥Õ½è, % Crude protein

    ¥N  Á   ¯à, kcal/kg Metabolizable energy

    ¶t, % Calcium

    Á`¡@¡@ÁC, % Total phosphorus

57.2

¡Ð

24.0

10.0

¡Ð

2.0

2.5

1.0

1.5

1.0

0.25

0.2

0.3

0.05

100.0

¡@

19.4

2,925

0.9

0.8

52.0

20.0

10.0

10.0

2.4

2.0

¡Ð

1.0

1.8

¡Ð

0.25

0.2

0.3

0.05

100.0

¡@

13.6

2,832

0.8

0.7

50.0

¡Ð

27.5

6.5

¡Ð

2.0

3.2

6.0

2.0

2.0

0.25

0.2

0.3

0.05

100.0

¡@

20.4

2,812

3.0

0.8

a Vitamin premix supplied the followings per kilogram of diet : Vitamin A, 15,000 IU; Cholecalciferol, 3,000 IU; Vitamin E, 25 IU; Vitamin K, 6 mg; Thiamin, 3 mg; Riboflavin, 9 mg; Pyridoxine, 6 mg; Vitamin B12, 0.03 mg; Ca-pantothenate, 18 mg; Niacin, 60 mg; Folic acid, 1.5 mg; Choline-HCl, 400 mg.

b Mineral premix supplied the followings per kilogram of diet : Mn, 40 mg (MnSO4.H2O); Zn, 60 mg (ZnO).

µ²ªG»P°Q½×

        ¨Ì50¶gÄÖ³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¡A¨â«~¨t¤§³J´ß±j«×¤Î³J­«¦pªí3©Ò¥Ü¡C¦Û30¶gÄÖ¦Ü80¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡¡A°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦¤§³J´ß±j«×§¡·¥ÅãµÛªº°ª©ó§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¡]P¡Õ0.01¡^¡A¤GªÌ®t¶Zºû«ù¦b0.37¡ã0.63 kg¡C¥H80¶gÄÖ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¤§³J´ß±j«×¬°3.21 kg¦Ó¨¥¡A»P§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¤§60¶gÄÖªº3.27¬Ûªñ¡A¥ç§Y¦b¤@©wªº³J´ß±j«×¤ô·Ç¤U¡A°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦¤ñ§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¬ù¥i©µªø20¶gÄÖ¤§¨Ï¥Î´Á­­¡C30¤Î40¶gÄÖ¤§³J­«¨â«~¨t¶¡¤§®t²§§¡¥¼¹FÅãµÛ¤ô·Ç¡AµMÀHµÛ¶gÄÖªº¼W¥[¡A¨â«~¨t¤§®t¶Z¥[¤j¡A±q50¶gÄÖ¨ì80¶gÄÖ¡A°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¤§³J­«ÅãµÛªº¤ñ§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¬°­«¡]P¡Õ0.05¡^¡A¥B¨â­Ó«~¨t¤§³J­«ºû«ù¦b1.6¦Ü2.7 g¤§®t¶Z¡C§õµ¥¡]1992¡^«ü¥X¡AµæÀn40¶gÄÖÅé­«»P³J­«§e¥¿¬ÛÃö¡]r¡×0.27¡ã0.51¡^¡A¦Ó¥»¸ÕÅ礤°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t»P§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¶¡¡AµL½×20¶gÄÖ©Î40¶gÄÖ¤§Åé­«§¡«D±`¬Ûªñ¡]ªí4¡^¡A¦]¦¹¡A°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¦³¸û­«ªº³J­«¡AÅãµM»PÅé­«µLÃö¡C

ªí3.¡@µæÀn³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¤§³J´ß±j«×¤Î³J­«¤§®t²§

Table 3. Eggshell strength and egg weight after eggshell strength selection for one generation in Tsaiya ducks

©Ê    ª¬ Traits

Àn      °¦      ¼Æ Number of ducks «~       ¨t Lines Åã   µÛ   ©Ê Significance

°ª³J´ß±j«× HES

§C³J´ß±j«× LES

³J´ß±j«× (kg) Eggshell strength

    30 wks

    40 wks

    50 wks

    60 wks

    70 wks

    80 wks

³J­« (g) Egg weight

    30 wks

    40 wks

    50 wks

    60 wks

    70 wks

    80 wks

¡@

217

212

195

178

176

174

¡@

217

212

195

178

176

174

¡@

4.48±0.06

43.4±0.07

3.87±0.07

3.77±0.09

3.48±0.08

3.21±0.09

¡@

65.0±0.4

68.3±0.5

70.1±0.4

70.3±0.5

69.6±0.5

66.8±0.5

¡@

4.09±0.06

3.84±0.07

3.50±0.07

3.27±0.08

2.97±0.08

2.58±0.09

¡@

64.7±0.4

67.4±0.4

68.5±0.4

67.6±0.5

67.1±0.5

64.3±0.5

¡@

**

**

**

**

**

**

¡@

NS

NS

*

**

**

*

* P¡Õ0.05, ** P¡Õ0.01, NS P¡Ö0.05.

HES¡GHigh eggshell strength.

LES¡GLow eggshell strength.

        °ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦Åã¥Üªì²£¤éÄÖ¸û±ß¡]ªí4¡^¡F¦b²£³J²v¤è­±¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÁöÅã¥Ü¦³¸û¨Îªº²£³J²v¡A¦ý¨â«~¨t®t²§©|¥¼¹FÅãµÛ¤ô·Ç¡C¦b80¶gÄÖ×H°©­«¦ûÅé­«¦Ê¤À²v¤è­±¡A¨â«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡CRoland et al.¡]1977¡^«ü¥X¡A76¶gÄÖ¤§³JÂû×H°©­«¡A²£µL´ß³J°ª¤ñ²v²ÕÅãµÛªº¸û§C¤ñ²v²Õ¬°°ª¡C¥»¸ÕÅ礤¨â«~¨t×H°©¤§­«¶q¡B¦Ç¤À¶q¡B¶t¤ÎÁC§t¶q§¡µLÅãµÛ¤§®t²§¡A¥i¯à¿ï©Þ³J´ß±j«×¤@¥N©|¤£¨¬¥H¼vÅT×H°©¤§²Õ¦¨¤À¡C¤Bµ¥¡]1992¡^³ø§i«ü¥X¡AµæÀnÁý¹}§t¶t1.98»P3.89% ¤é³¡A¦b³J´ß«p«×¤è­±¦³ÅãµÛ¼vÅT¡A¦ý×H°©¤¤¶t¤ÎÁC§t¶q¨â²Õ¶¡¡]¤À§O¬°37.0¡B37.2¤Î17.1¡B17.0%¡^¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C

ªí4.¡@µæÀn³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¤§Åé­«¡Bªì²£¤éÄÖ¡B²£³J²v¤Î×H°©¦Ç¤À¶q¤§¤ñ¸û

Table 4. Comparison on body weight, age at first egg, egg production rate and ash of tibia for Tsaiya ducks after eggshell strength selection for one generation

©Ê    ª¬ Traits

Àn    °¦    ¼Æ Number of ducks «~       ¨t Lines Åã   µÛ   ©Ê Significance

°ª³J´ß±j«× HES

§C³J´ß±j«× LES

Åé­«¡]kg¡^ Body weight

    20¶gÄÖ

    40¶gÄÖ

²£³J²v¡]%¡^Egg production rate

    52¶gÄÖ

    78¶gÄÖ

ªì²£¤éÄÖ¡]day ¡^Age at first egg

×H°©­«/Åé­«¡]%¡^Tibia wt./body wt.

×H°©¡]°®°ò¡^1 Tibia (dry basis)

    ¦Ç¤À¡]%¡^Ash

    ¶t§t¶q¡]%¡^Calcium

    ÁC§t¶q¡]%¡^Phosphorus

¡@

220

220

¡@

207

185

217

20

¡@

20

20

20

¡@

1.33±0.01

1.37±0.01

¡@

79.4±1.2

82.3±1.3

118±1

0.34±0.01

¡@

60.32±0.66

37.1±0.8

15.9±0.1

¡@

1.31±0.01

1.37±0.01

¡@

82.5±1.1

84.2±1.3

113±1

0.36±0.02

¡@

61.35±0.66

37.9±0.7

16.0±0.1

¡@

NS

NS

¡@

NS

NS

**

NS

¡@

NS

NS

NS

1 80¶gÄ֮ɱĨú×H°©¡C

Tibia taken at 80 wks of age.

** P¡Õ0.01, NS P¡Ö0.05.

        ¹}³¶t§t¶q©M«~¨t¹ï8¶gÄÖµæÀn¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¤§¼vÅT¦pªí5©Ò¥Ü¡C¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¡A°ª¡B§C¨â³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C¹}³¤¤¶t§t¶q0.8% »P1.6% ¨â²Õ¶¡¹ï8¶gÄÖÀn°¦¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¥çµLÅãµÛ¼vÅT¡A«~¨t»P¹}³¶t§t¶q¤§¥æ·P®ÄÀ³¥ç¤£ÅãµÛ¡C¦å²G¤¤pH¡B¡eHCO3-¡fµ¥¦U©Êª¬¨â«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡]ªí6¡^¡A¦ÓÁý¹}¶t§t¶q0.8% ²ÕÀn°¦¦å²G¤¤¡eHCO3-¡fÅãµÛªº¤ñ1.6% ²ÕÀn°¦ªÌ¬°°ª¡]P¡Õ0.05¡^¡A«~¨t»P¹}³¶t§t¶q¤§¥æ·P®ÄÀ³¦b8¶gÄÖÀn°¦¦å²G¤¤pHµ¥©Êª¬«h¥¼¹FÅãµÛ¤ô·Ç¡C

        ¹}³¶t§t¶q©M«~¨t¹ï11¶gÄÖµæÀn¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¤§¼vÅT¦pªí7©Ò¥Ü¡C°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦11¶gÄ֮ɡA¦å¼ß¤¤Åã¥Ü¸û°ªªºÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê©M¸û§CªºÁ`¶t¿@«×¡A¦ý¦å¼ßµL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¨â«~¨t¶¡«hµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C¹}³§t0.8©Î0.4% ¤§¶t¹ï11¶gÄÖÀn°¦¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×§¡µLÅãµÛ¼vÅT¡A«~¨t»P¹}³¶t§t¶q¤§¥æ·P®ÄÀ³¥ç¤£ÅãµÛ¡CLin and Shen¡]1979¡^«ü¥X¡A¤é³¶t§t¶q¦b0.1¡ã1.4% ½d³ò¡A¹ï0¡ã3¶gÄÖ¤gµfÀn¦å²M¤¤¶t¿@«×¡A²Õ§O¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C¥i¨£¤é³¤¤¤£¦P¤ô·Ç¶t§t¶q¡Aµu´Á¤º¹ïÀn°¦¦å¼ß¤¤¶t¡BÁC¿@«×¼vÅT¤£¤j¡CÁý¹}¤é³¶t§t¶q0.4% ¤§Àn°¦¨ä¦å²G¤¤pCO2¤Î¡eHCO3-¡fÅãµÛªº¸ûÁý¹}0.8% ²ÕÀn°¦ªÌ¬°°ª¡]ªí8¡^¡A¦ÓpH¡BpO2¤ÎO2% ©ó¨âºØ¹}³¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C

ªí5. ¹}³¶t§t¶q©M«~¨t®ÄÀ³¹ï8¶gÄÖµæÀn¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¤§¼vÅT1

Table 5. Effects of dietary calcium level and lines on alkali phosphatase activity (ALP), inorganic phosphorus (IP) and calcium (Ca) levels in plasma of 8 wks old Tsaiya ducks

®ÄÀ³ Effect

ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê ALP (unit2)

µL¾÷ÁC§t¶q IP (mg/dL)

Á` ¶t ¿@ «× Ca (mg/dL)

«~¨t Lines

°ª³J´ß±j«× HES

§C³J´ß±j«× LES

¹}³¶t§t¶q¡]%¡^Calcium levels

    0.8

    1.6

«~¨t¡Ñ¹}³¶t§t¶q¥æ·P®ÄÀ³ Interaction

¦X¨Ö¾÷®t Pooled SEM

¾÷®t¦Û¥Ñ«× Error df

NS

6.75

6.18

NS

6.35

6.58

NS

0.25

214

NS

5.81

6.06

NS

6.03

5.83

NS

0.09

214

NS

9.75

9.71

NS

9.72

9.74

NS

0.15

214

1ªí¤¤¼Æ­È¬°³Ì¤p¦Û­¼¥­§¡¡C

  Value of least squares means.

2 ¦å¼ß0.1 ml ©ó37 ¢J °ö¾i30¤ÀÄÁ«á©ÒÄÀ¥X¨C0.05 £gmole¤§p-nitrophenol¬° 1 unit¡C

  Plasma 0.1 ml under 37 ¢J incubation for 30 min. liberated 0.05 £gmole p-nitrophenol is equivalent to 1 unit.

NSP¡Ö0.05.

¡@

ªí6.¡@¹}³¶t§t¶q©M«~¨t®ÄÀ³¹ï8¶gÄÖµæÀn¦å²G©Êª¬¤§¼vÅT1

Table 6. Effects of dietary calcium level and lines on blood parameters of 8 wks old Tsaiya ducks

®Ä    À³ Effect PH

pCO2 (mmHg)

  pO2   (mmHg)

[HCO3-] (mmol/L)

O2%
«~¨tLines

°ª³J´ß±j«×HES

§C³J´ß±j«×LES

¹}³¶t§t¶q¡]%¡^Calcium levels

    0.8

    1.6

«~¨t¡Ñ¹}³¶t§t¶q¥æ·P®ÄÀ³ Interaction

¦X¨Ö¾÷®t Pooled SEM

¾÷®t¦Û¥Ñ«× Error df

NS

7.315

7.322

NS

7.324

7.313

NS

0.005

214

NS

37.1

36.2

NS

36.8

36.5

NS

0.5

214

NS

61.7

61.9

NS

61.2

62.5

NS

0.7

214

NS

18.1

17.9

*

18.3

17.7

NS

0.2

214

NS

79.8

80.2

NS

80.2

79.8

NS

0.8

214

1ªí¤¤¼Æ­È¬°³Ì¤p¦Û­¼¥­§¡¡C

  Value of least squares means.

* P¡Õ0.05, NS P¡Ö0.05.

¡@

ªí7.¡@¹}³¶t§t¶q©M«~¨t®ÄÀ³¹ï11¶gÄÖµæÀn¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¤§¼vÅT1

Table 7. Effects of dietary calcium level and lines on plasma alkali phosphatase activity (ALP), inorganic phosphorus (IP) and calcium (Ca) levels in plasma of 11 wks old Tsaiya ducks

®ÄÀ³ Effect

ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê ALP (unit2)

µL¾÷ÁC§t¶q IP (mg/dL)

Á` ¶t ¿@ «× Ca (mg/dL)

«~¨t Lines

°ª³J´ß±j«× HES

§C³J´ß±j«× LES

¹}³¶t§t¶q¡]%¡^Calcium levels

    0.8

    0.4

«~¨t¡Ñ¹}³¶t§t¶q¥æ·P®ÄÀ³ Interaction

¦X¨Ö¾÷®t Pooled SEM

¾÷®t¦Û¥Ñ«× Error df

**

6.79

5.77

NS

6.34

3.22

NS

0.25

213

NS

5.14

4.88

NS

4.94

5.08

NS

0.16

213

*

10.57

10.90

NS

10.83

10.64

NS

0.09

213

1ªí¤¤¼Æ­È¬°³Ì¤p¦Û­¼¥­§¡¡C

  Value of least squares means.

2¨£ªí5µù2¡C

  See Table 5 note 2.

* P¡Õ0.05, ** P¡Õ0.01, NS P¡Ö0.05.

¡@

¡@

ªí8.¡@¹}³¶t§t¶q©M«~¨t®ÄÀ³¹ï11¶gÄÖµæÀn¦å²G©Êª¬¤§¼vÅT1

Table 8. Effects of dietary calcium level and lines on blood parameters of 11 wks old Tsaiya ducks

®Ä    À³ Effect PH

pCO2 (mmHg)

  pO2   (mmHg)

[HCO3-] (mmol/L)

O2%
«~¨tLines

°ª³J´ß±j«×HES

§C³J´ß±j«×LES

¹}³¶t§t¶q¡]%¡^Calcium levels

    0.8

    0.4

«~¨t¡Ñ¹}³¶t§t¶q¥æ·P®ÄÀ³ Interaction

¦X¨Ö¾÷®t Pooled SEM

¾÷®t¦Û¥Ñ«× Error df

NS

7.322

7.324

NS

7.321

7.326

NS

0.006

213

NS

35.1

34.1

*

33.8

35.5

NS

0.5

213

NS

66.9

66.3

NS

67.0

66.2

NS

0.6

213

NS

17.5

17.0

**

16.7

17.8

NS

0.2

213

NS

84.5

84.5

NS

84.5

84.5

NS

0.5

213

1ªí¤¤¼Æ­È¬°³Ì¤p¦Û­¼¥­§¡¡C

  Value of least squares means.

* P¡Õ0.05, ** P¡Õ0.01, NS P¡Ö0.05.

        ¤Q¥|¶gÄÖ¨â«~¨t¦å²G¤¤¦U©Êª¬¤§¤ñ¸û¦pªí9©Ò¥Ü¡C¦å¼ß¤¤Á`¶t§t¶q¤ÎµL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t§¡·¥ÅãµÛªº¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡]P¡Õ0.01¡^¡A¦ý¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡A¨â«~¨t¶¡«hµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C¦å²GpH¤Î¨ä¥L©Êª¬©ó¨â«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡CCombs et al.¡]1979¡^«ü¥X¡A·í18¶gÄÖ¥H«á¹}³¤¤¶t§t¶q±q1.0% ´£°ª¨ì3.5% ®É¡A21¡ã23 ¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t³JÂû¦å¼ß¤¤Á`¶t¶qÅãµÛªº¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¬°°ª¡C¥»¸ÕÅ礤§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦¡A©ó11¶gÄ֮ɧYÅã¥Ü¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦¦³¸û°ªªº¦å¼ßÁ`¶t¿@«×¡AÅãµM¦b©|¥¼ÅÜ´«¬°²£³JÀn®Æ¡A¹}³¶t§t¶q¥¼§ïÅܤ§«e¡A¨â«~¨tÀn°¦¦b±µªñ©Ê¦¨¼ô®É¡A¨ä¦å¼ß¤¤¶t¿@«×ªº½Õ¾ãÅãµM¤£¦P¡C

ªí9.¡@µæÀn³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¹ï14¶gÄÖ¦å²G©Êª¬¤§¼vÅT

Table 9. Effect on blood parameters of 14 wks old Tsaiya ducks after eggshell strength selection for one generation

©Ê    ª¬ Traits «~¨t Lines Åã  µÛ  ©Ê Significance
°ª³J´ß±j«× HES §C³J´ß±j«× LES
Àn°¦¼Æ Number of ducks

¦å²G Blood

pH

pCO2(mmHg)

pO2(mmHg)

[HCO3-](mmol/L)

O2%

¦å¼ß Plasma

ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê ALP (unit/0.1 ml)

µL¾÷ÁC§t¶q IP (mg/dL)

Á`¶t¿@«× Ca (mg/dL)

107

¡@

7.320±0.002

42.2±0.6

65.2±0.6

20.8±0.2

83.3±0.5

¡@

5.60±0.48

4.36±0.36

13.23±0.61

111

¡@

7.325±0.005

42.3±0.6

64.1±0.6

21.1±0.2

82.2±0.7

¡@

5.32±0.47

5.29±0.22

16.46±0.59

¡@

¡@

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

¡@

NS

**

**

** P¡Õ0.01, NS P¡Ö0.05.

        ²£³J´Á¶¡¡]20¡ã50¶gÄÖ¡^¤§¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡]ªí10¡^¡A°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t§¡·¥ÅãµÛ¦a°ª©ó§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¡]P¡Õ0.01¡^¡AµM¦å¼ß¤¤µL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¤ÎÁ`¶t¶q¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t«hÅãµÛªº¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡]P¡Õ0.05¡^¡CAbdallah et al.¡]1993¡^«ü¥X¡A²£»´³J´ß²Õ¥ÀÂû¤ñ²£­«³J´ß²Õ¥ÀÂû¦³¸û°ªªº¦å¼ßµL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¤ÎÁ`¶t¶q¡A¥i¯à¨ä¹ïÂಾ¦å¶t¦Ü³J´ß¤¤ªº®Ä²v¸û®t©Ò­P¡CCombs et al.¡]1979¡^¥ç«ü¥X¡A¦b¤é³¶t§t¶q´£°ª®É¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÂû°¦¡A¹ï½Õ¸`¦å²G¤¤¶t¿@«×«í©w©Ê¡]homeostasis¡^¤§¯à¤O¡A¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°®t¡C¥»¸ÕÅ礤§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦¡A¦Û11¶gÄÖ°_§YÅã¥Ü¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¦³¸û°ªªº¦å¼ß¶t¿@«×¡A¥i¯à¹ïÂಾ¦å¶t¦Ü°©¤¤©Î³J´ßªº®Ä²v¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦§¡¤ñ°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¸û®t©Ò­P¡C¨â«~¨t¦å¼ßµL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¡A40¤Î50¶gÄÖ¦]¥¼¸T­¹§¡¤ñ20¤Î30¶gÄÖ¬°§C¡A¦¹²{¶H»P§õµ¥¡]1997¡^©Ò­z¤§µ²ªG¬Û·í¤@­P¡A¥i¯à¦]¸T­¹¦Ó¨Ï¨Ó¦Û°©¤¤ÁCªºÄÀ¥X§ó¦h©Ò­P¡C

ªí10. µæÀn³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¹ï²£³J´Á¶¡¦å¼ß¤¤ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡BµL¾÷ÁC§t¶q¤ÎÁ`¶t¿@«×¤§¼vÅT

Table 10. Effect on alkali phosphatase activity(ALP), inorganic phosphorus(IP) and calcium(Ca) levels in plasma of Tsaiya ducks during laying period after eggshell strength selection for one generation

©Ê                    ª¬Traits

¶g                   ÄÖAge (wk)

«~    ¨t Lines

Åã          µÛ         ©ÊSignificance

°ª³J´ß±j«×HES §C³J´ß±j«×LES
ÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê

ALP (unit/ 0.1 ml)

20 wks

30 wks

40 wks1

50 wks1

7.63±0.37

7.13±0.35

9.52±0.58

11.65±0.61

5.47±0.36

4.80±0.32

5.24±0.55

6.80±0.60

**

**

**

**

µL¾÷ÁC¿@«×

IP (mg/dL)

20 wks

30 wks

40 wks1

50 wks1

12.75±0.36

13.64±0.34

10.01±0.16

10.12±0.24

15.15±0.35

15.40±0.32

10.54±0.15

11.09±0.23

**

**

*

**

Á`¶t¿@«×

Ca (mg/dL)

20 wks

30 wks

40 wks1

50 wks1

28.75±0.86

33.67±0.87

34.32±0.70

35.40±0.72

33.00±0.78

37.67±0.81

36.93±0.66

39.16±0.70

**

**

**

**

1 ±Ä¦å«e¥¼¤©¸T­¹¡C

   Without fasting before blood sampling.

* P¡Õ0.05, ** P¡Õ0.01.

        ³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¹ï30¡ã50¶gÄÖ´Á¶¡¦å²GpHµ¥©Êª¬¤§¼vÅT¦pªí11©Ò¥Ü¡C¦å²G¤¤pCO2¡BpO2¤ÎO2%¡A¨â«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡ApH«h©ó40¶gÄ֮ɰª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÅãµÛªº¸û§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡A¦Ó¡eHCO3-¡f«h©ó30¤Î50¶gÄ֮ɰª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÅãµÛªº¤ñ§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°§C¡CHamilton and Thompson¡]1980¡^¤ÀªR¿ï©Þ²£³J¼Æ¡B²£³J²v¤Î¹ï·Ó«~¨t3­Ó¤£¦P¤è¦Vªº³JÂûÅã¥Ü¡A³J´ß­«¡B³J¤ñ­«¡B³æ¦ì­±¿n¤§´ß­«µ¥©Êª¬¡A¦U«~¨t¶¡§¡¦³ÅãµÛ®t²§¡A¦ý¦å²GpH¡BpCO2¡B¡eHCO3-¡f¤ÎpO2¤è­±«~¨t¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡C30¡ã50¶gÄÖ²£³J´Á¶¡¡A¦å²G¤¤Ca++¡BK+¡BNa+ ¿@«×¨â«~¨t¶¡§¡µLÅãµÛ®t²§¡]ªí12¡^¡AÅã¥Ü¦å²G¤¤³o¨Ç©Êª¬¦b¥¿±`±¡ªp¤U¬Oºû«ù¦b¤@í©wª¬ºA¡CKoch et al.¡]1984¡^¥H44¶gÄÖ¤§«p´ß³J¤ÎÁ¡´ß³J«~¨t¤§¥ÀÂû¡A¦b³J¶i¤J¤l®c«á12¤p®É¶}©l¡A¨C¹j5¤ÀÄÁ¦åºÞª`¤JEGTA ¡]ethyleneglycol-bis¡]£]-aminoethylether¡^-N, N¡¦-tetraacetic acid¡^¡A¤ÀªR¦å²G¤¤¶tÂ÷¤l¤§ÅܤÆÅã¥Ü¡A¦å²G¤¤´åÂ÷©Ê¶t¿@«×¤§Åܤƨâ«~¨t¶¡¨ÃµL©úÅã®t²§¡C

        ¬°±´°Q²£¥¿±`³J»P²£³n´ß³J¤§¥ÀÂû¡A¦b¦å²G©Êª¬¤§®t²§¡AHester et al.¡]1980¡^¨Ì²£³n´ß³J¤§¤ñ²v±N³JÂû¤À¬°2¸s¡A¤ÀªR¤l®c¤¤¦³³J»P­è²£³J«á¤§¥ÀÂû¦å²G©Êª¬¤§®t²§¡Aµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡A²£¥¿±`³J¤§¥ÀÂû¤l®c¤¤¦³³JªÌ¡A¨ä¦å¼ß¤¤µL¾÷ÁC¿@«×ÅãµÛªº¸û­è²£³J«á¤§¥ÀÂû¬°°ª¡]¤À§O¬°4.59¤Î3.59 mg/dL¡^¡A¦Ó²£³n´ß³J¥ÀÂû¡A¤l®c¤¤¦³Á¡¡]³n¡^´ß³JªÌ¨ä¦å¼ß¤¤µL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¤Ï¦Ó¤ñ­è²£¤U³JªÌ¬°§C¡]¤À§O¬°3.94¤Î4.34 mg/dL¡^¡AÅãµM²£¥¿±`³J»P²£³n´ß³J¤§¥ÀÂû¡A¦b¦å¼ßµL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¤è­±¡A©ó²£³J

ªí11.¡@µæÀn³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¹ï²£³J´Á¶¡¦å²G©Êª¬¤§¼vÅT

Table 11. Effect on blood parameters of Tsaiya ducks during laying period after eggshell strength selection for one generation

©Ê                 ª¬Traits

¶g             ÄÖAge (wk)

«~    ¨t Lines

Åã   µÛ   ©ÊSignificance

°ª³J´ß±j«×HES §C³J´ß±j«×LES
pH

30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

7.293±0.004

7.308±0.004

7.266±0.004

7.298±0.004

7.296±0.004

7.264±0.004

NS

*

NS

pCO2 (mmHg) 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

45.5±0.5

55.2±0.7

56.1±0.7

46.0±0.5

56.9±0.6

57.3±0.7

NS

NS

NS

pO2 (mmHg) 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

59.3±0.8

58.2±0.8

62.4±0.8

58.4±0.8

57.6±0.7

62.1±0.8

NS

NS

NS

[HCO3-] (mmol/L) 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

21.2±0.1

26.5±0.2

24.4±0.2

21.6±0.1

26.6±0.2

24.9±0.2

*

NS

*

O2% 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

77.1±0.7

76.4±0.8

78.8±0.7

77.2±0.7

75.3±0.8

77.9±0.7

NS

NS

NS

* P¡Õ0.05, NS P¡Ö0.05.

¡@

ªí12.¡@µæÀn³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¤@¥N¹ï²£³J´Á¶¡¦å²G¤¤¶t¡B¹[¡B¶uÂ÷¤l¿@«×¤§¼vÅT

Table 12. Effect on blood Ca++, K+, and Na+ of Tsaiya ducks during laying period after eggshell strength selection for one generation

©Ê    ª¬ Traits

¶g    ÄÖ Age (wk)

«~    ¨t Lines
°ª³J´ß±j«×HES §C³J´ß±j«×LES
¶tÂ÷¤lCa++ (mmol/L) 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

1.41±0.01

1.42±0.01

1.37±0.01

1.41±0.01

1.45±0.01

1.38±0.01

¹[Â÷¤lK+ (mmol/L) 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

4.06±0.05

3.80±0.04

4.22±0.04

3.99±0.04

3.81±0.04

4.29±0.04

¶uÂ÷¤lNa+ (mmol/L) 30 wks

40 wks

50 wks

136.9±0.2

136.1±0.2

134.5±0.9

137.2±0.2

136.2±0.2

140.5±0.9

¨â«~¨t¶¡®t²§¤£ÅãµÛ¡]P¡Ö0.05)¡C

No difference between 2 lines.

        «e«á¦³¤£¦Pªº¤ÏÀ³¡C¥»¸ÕÅ礤°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦30¡ã80¶gÄÖªº³J´ß±j«×¤Î50¡ã80¶gÄÖ³J­«§¡ÅãµÛ°ª©ó§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨tªÌ¡AÁöµM80¶gÄÖ×H°©¤¤¦Ç¤À¡B¶t¤ÎÁC§t¶q¡A¨â«~¨t¶¡¨ÃµLÅãµÛ®t²§¡A¦ý°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨tÀn°¦11¶gÄ֤β£³J´Á¶¡¡A¦å¼ß¤¤Åã¥Ü¸û°ªªºÆP©ÊÁC»ÄúA¬¡©Ê¡A14¶gÄ֤β£³J´Á¶¡¦å¼ß¤¤µL¾÷ÁC¿@«×¤ÎÁ`¶t¶q¡A§C³J´ß±j«×«~¨t«hÅãµÛªº¸û°ª³J´ß±j«×«~¨t¬°°ª¡AÅã¥Ü³J´ß±j«×Âù¦V¿ï©Þ¹ïÀn°¦¦å²G©Êª¬¤w³y¦¨©úÅ㪺§ïÅÜ¡C

»x  ÁÂ

        ¥»¬ã¨s©Ó»X¦æ¬F°|°ê®a¬ì¾Ç©e­û·|¸g¶O¸É§U¡]NSC-84-2321-B-002-048¡^¡A¦b¦¹²`­PÁ§աC

°Ñ¦Ò¤åÄm

        ¤B¸Ö¦P¡B±iı«e¤Î¨H²K´I¡C1992¡C¹}³¤¤Áâ©M¶t§t¶q¹ï²£³JµæÀn¤Î¨Ó¯èÂû³J´ß«~½è¥H¤Î¦å¼ß¡B³J´ß©M°©Àf¤¤Äqª«½è§t¶q¤§¼vÅT¡C¤¤µØ¹A¾Ç·|³ø157¡G97¡ã107¡C

        §õµÏºa¡B¨H²K´I¤Î«¸©µ¦~¡C1997¡Cµu´Á¸T­¹¹ï²£³JµæÀn¦å²G©Êª¬¤§¼vÅT¡C¤¤¯b·|»x26(1)¡G109¡ã115¡C

        §õµÏºa¡B¶À®¶ªÚ¡B³¯øÊ¯q¡B³\«n¤s¡B«¸©µ¦~¡B¼B·ç¬Ã¡BÀ¹Á¾¤Î³¯«O°ò¡C1992¡C½Å¦âµæÀn²£³J©Ê¯à¤§±´°Q¡C¯b²£¬ã¨s25(1)¡G1¡ã14¡C

        §õµÏºa¡B¼ï¥Í¤~¡B®}±f°]¤Î³¯«O°ò¡C1991¡C²£³JµæÀnÅ¢¹}¤§±´°Q¡C¯b²£¬ã¨s24(2)¡G177¡ã185¡C

        Abdallah, A. G., R. H. Harms and O. El-Husseiny. 1993. Performance of hens laying eggs with heavy or light shell weight when fed diets with different calcium and phosphorus levels. Poultry Sci. 72¡G1881¡ã1891.

        Buss, E. G., P. Merkur and R. B. Guyer. 1980. Urinary excretion of calcium in the presence or absence of shell formation by chickens producing thick or thin shells. Poultry Sci. 59¡G885¡ã887.

        Chen, P. S., Jr., T. Y. Toribara and H. Warner. 1956. Microdetermination of phosphorus. Anal. Chem. 28¡G1756¡ã1758.

        Combs, G. F., Jr., A. H. Parsons and M. B. Ross. 1979. Calcium homeostasis in pullets of two lines selected for differences in eggshell strength. Poultry Sci. 58¡G1250¡ã1256.

        Grunder, A. A., R. B. Guyer, E. G. Buss and C. O. Clagett. 1980. Effect of estradiol on calcium and calcium binding in serum of thick and thin-shell lines of chickens. Poultry Sci. 59¡G2776¡ã2781.

        Hamilton, R. M. G. and B. K. Thompson. 1980. Effects of sodium plus potassium to chloride ratio in practical type diets on blood gas levels in three strains of White Leghorn hens and the relationship between acid-base balance and egg shell strength. Poultry Sci. 59¡G1294¡ã1303.

        Hester, P. Y., E. K. Wilson, F. W. Pierson and I. Fabijanska. 1980. Plasma inorganic phosphate, calcium, and magnesium levels of hens which laid soft-shelled or shell-less eggs. Poultry Sci. 59¡G2336¡ã2341.

        Izat, A. L., F. A. Gardner and D. B. Mellor. 1985. Effects of age of bird and season of the year on egg quality 1. Shell quality. Poultry Sci. 64¡G1900¡ã1906.

        Koch, J., E. G. Buss and R. F. Wideman. 1984. Blood ionic calcium responses of hens from thick-shell and thin-shell lines to ethyleneglycol-bis-(b-aminoethylether) -N,N'-tetraacetic acid injections. Poultry Sci. 63¡G172¡ã175.

        Lin, I. M. and T. F. Shen. 1979. Studies on duck nutrition 2. Calcium and phosphorus requirements of mule ducklings. Poultry Sci. 58¡G124¡ã130.

        Linhardt, K. and K. Walter. 1964. Phosphatases determination in serum with p-nitrophenylphosphate . In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (Ed. by Hans Ulrich Bergmeyer), pp. 779¡ã785.

        Roland, D. A. Sr., D. J. Holcombe and R. H. Harms. 1977. Further studies with hens producing a high incidence of non-calcified or partially calcified egg shells. Poultry Sci. 56¡G1232¡ã1236.

        SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT—û„µ User¡¥s Guide. Ver. 6, 6th Ed., SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

        Washburn, K. W. 1982. Incidence, cause and prevention of egg shell breakage in commercial production. Poultry Sci. 61¡G2005¡ã2012.

        Wideman, R. F. Jr. and E. G. Buss. 1985. Percent shell and plasma mineral concentrations in three strains of domestic fowl selected for thick or thin egg shell production. Poultry Sci. 64¡G388¡ã395.

¡@

¡@

Comparison on Blood Parameters of Tsaiya Ducks after Eggshell Strength Selection for One Generation

Shuen-Rong Lee(1)(3), Tian-Fuh Shen(2) and Yan-Nian Jiang(2)

Received Apr. 27, 1998; Accepted Jul. 6, 1998

ABSTRACT

        Based on eggshell strength at 50 weeks of age, Tsaiya ducks were selected for high (HES) and low eggshell strength lines (LES). The present study was designed to compare blood parameters between 2 lines after one generation of selection. The results indicated that eggshell strength during 30¡ã80 weeks and egg weight during 50¡ã80 weeks of age from HES ducks were higher than those of LES. No difference was found between the two lines in percentage of ash, calcium (Ca) or inorganic phosphorus (IP) in tibia. At 11 weeks of age, ducks of HES had higher plasma alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and lower Ca level than ducks of LES. Plasma ALP activity of ducks from HES during laying period (30¡ã50 weeks of age) was higher than those of LES, but plasma Ca and IP levels of ducks from LES at 14 weeks of age and in laying period was higher than those of HES. No difference was found between the two lines in blood pH, pCO2, pO2, O2% or [HCO3-] at 8, 11 and 14 weeks of age. During laying period, no difference was found between the two lines in blood pCO2, pO2, O2% or Ca++, K+, Na+. Blood pH of ducks from HES at 40 weeks of age was higher than those of LES, and blood [HCO3-] of ducks from HES at 30 and 40 weeks of age was lower than those of LES. No difference was found in plasma ALP activity, Ca or IP levels at 8 and 11 weeks of age under different dietary Ca levels. Blood [HCO3-] of ducks fed 1.6 % Ca diet at 8 weeks of age was lower than those of fed 0.8 % Ca diet, and that of ducks fed 0.4 % Ca diet at 11 weeks of age was higher than those fed 0.8 % Ca diet.¡]Key Words¡GTsaiya ducks, Blood parameter, Eggshell strength¡^

¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w

(1) I-Lan station, Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, I-Lan, Taiwan.

(2) Department of Animal Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

(3) Corresponding author.

¤¤°ê¯bªª¾Ç·|·|»x ²Ä28¨÷ ²Ä1´Á 19¡ã32, 1999