áÂ÷ūפήɶ¡¹ï³J¶À«~½è¤§¼vÅT
³¯©É¥ü(1)(2)¡@±i³Óµ½(2)
¦¬¥ó¤é´Á¡G86¦~11¤ë17¤é¡F±µ¨ü¤é´Á¡G86¦~12¤ë19¤é
ºKn¡G¥»¸ÕÅç¥Øªº¦b±´°Q¤£¦PáÂ÷ūסB®É¶¡¹ï©ó³J¶À¾÷¯à©Ê¤Î¶JÂéʤ§¼vÅT¡A¨ÃÀË´úáÂôÁ¶¡·L¥Íª«ÅܤƤΨѧ@³J¿|¤§ì®Æ¹ï¨ä«~½è¤§¼vÅT¡C¸ÕÅçµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡A³J¶ÀÀHáÂ÷ūפU°¤ÎáÂîɶ¡¼W¥[¨äÂH«×©úÅã¼W¥[¡A¦P®É¦ñÀH¿B«×¤W¤É¤Î·»¸Ñ«×¤U°¡A¥B¨ä pH È¥ç§e½wºC¤U°¤§ÁͶաA¦Ó¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J áÂê̸û¬°©úÅã¡C¦b¤TÓáÂ÷ū׳B²z¤¤¡A¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J ²Õ©ó¶JÂëe 4 ¶g³J¶À¦³¸û¨Î¤§¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¡]emulsifying capacity¡^¡A¦Ó ¡Ð18 ¢J áÂę̂ä¨Å¤Æ®e¶q³Ì®t¡F¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¡]emulsion stability¡^«h¥H ¡Ð18 ¢J áÂę̂ä¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê³Ì®t¡A¬ù¤U° 20%¡A¡Ð3 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J ³B²zªÌ¨ä¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¥ç§e¤U°ÁͶաA¨ä¤¤¤´¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J áÂê̦³¸û¨Î¤§¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¡C¦b·L¥Íª«ÀË´ú¤è±¡A¡Ð3 ¢J¡A¡Ð6 ¢J áÂÃ¦Ü 6 ¶g®É¡A¨äÁ`¥Íµß¼Æ§¡¹F 106 CFU/ml ¥H¤W¡A¦Ó ¡Ð18 ¢J áÂê̫h¦³©úÅ㪺§íµß®ÄªG¡A¦báÂäGÓ¤ë«á¡A¨äÁ`¥Íµß¼Æ§C©ó 103 CFU/ml ¥H¤U¡F¦b¤TÓáÂ÷ū׳B²z«á¡A¨ä¤j¸z±ìµß¸s¥Íªø§¡¨ü¨ì§í¨î¡A¥BÀHáÂ÷ūפU°¤ÎáÂîɶ¡©µªø¦Ó®ÄªG·U¨Î¡A¦Ü©ó¨Fªù¤óµßÀË´úµ²ªG«h§¡§e³±©Ê¤ÏÀ³¡C¦b®üºø³J¿|¸ÕÅ礤¡A¥H ¡Ð18 ¢J ³B²zªÌ¡A¨Ñ»s¦¨³J¿|¤§Åé¿n»P·sÂA³J¶À¤ñ¸û·|´î¤Ö¥B²Õ´¦H¤Æ¡F©ó ¡Ð3 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J áÂà 4 ¶g¤º¯à±o¨ì¸û¨Îªº³J¿|Åé¿n¤Î²Õ´¡C¡]ÃöÁä»y¡GáÂ÷ūסBáÂîɶ¡¡B³J¶À¡B«~½è¡^
¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w
(1)¥xÆW¬Ù¯b²£¸ÕÅç©Ò¥[¤u¨t¡A¥x«n¿¤
(2)°ê¥ß¤¤¿³¤j¾Ç¯b²£¨t¡A¥x¤¤¥«
(3)Corresponding author.
ºü ¨¥
°ê¤º¸V³J²£¶q¤Î»ù®æ¨ü©u¸`¼vÅT¦Ü¹d¡A¦p¦ó¦b§C»ù¦h²£®É±NÂA³J»s§@¦¨§Ná²G³J¡A«S³J°ª»ù¤Ö²£®É¦A±N¤§¸Ñá¥H¨Ñ¨Ï¥Î¡A¤w¬°¥Ø«e°ê¤º¥Î¥H¸Ñ¨M¦¹°ÝÃD¤§«n¤èªk¡C±©³J¶À¦b ¡Ð6 ¢J ¥H¤UáÂëá¡A¨ä¾®½¦¤Æ²{¶H¨Ï¨Ñ»s§@¹«~¡]¥Dn¬°³J¿|¡^±`²£¥Í§xÂZ¡A¥ç§Y¨äª«²z©Ê¡]ÂH«×¡B·»¸Ñ«×¡^¤Î¨Å¤Æ©Êµ¥¾÷¯à¯S©Ê¦H¤Æ¡]Cotterill et al., 1976¡F±i¡A1983¡^¡C¨s¨äì¦]¤D¬°³J¶À¤º¤§§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ½è¾®¶°©ÒP¡]Saari et al., 1964; Wakamatu and Sato, 1980¡^¡Cªñ¦~¨Ó³¡¤Àáµ²¡]partial freezing¡^¤w¼sªx¦a¹B¥Î©ó³½Ãþªº«O¦s¥H´£°ª¶JÂôÁ¶¡³½¦×¤§ÂA«×¡A¦Ó¯à¦³¨}¦nªº®ÄªG¡]¤º¤s¡A1988¡^¡A¥B¥Ñ©ó°ê¤º²G³J·~ªÌ©ÒÃö¤ßªº°ÝÃD¥ç¬O§C·ÅáÂùï²G³J©Ò³y¦¨¤§¶Ë®`¡A¥H´Á´M¨Dµu´Á§Ná¶JÂëá§Y¨Ñ§Q¥Î¤§áÂ÷ūסA¬G¹Á¸Õ¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J µ¥·Å«×¶i¦æ²G³J¤§¶J¦s¡AµM¦Ó ¡Ð3 ¢J ªº«O¦s¤è¦¡»P¤@¯ë©Ò¿×³Ì¤j¦B´¹¥Í¦¨±aªº²z½×¦ü¥G¦³©Ò¯¡Ä²¡A¦]¦¹¡A³¡¤Àáµ²¬O§_¾A¥Î©ó¨ä¥L°ª³J¥Õ½è¹«~¤§«O¦s¡A¥ç©Î³¡¤Àáµ²¸ûáµ²¶J¦s¦³§ó¦nªº®ÄªG¡H¦¹¬°«E»Ý¬ã¨s¤§°ÝÃD¡C
§÷®Æ»P¤èªk
¤@.¸ÕÅç§÷®Æ
¥Ñ¹Å¸q¥«¶Ô»õ³J«~¤½¥q©Ò´£¨Ñ¤§¥¼±þµß·sÂA³J¶À²G¡A¥B©ó 2 ¤p®É¤º¹B¦^¹êÅç«Ç¡A¥B©ó¹B°e³~¤¤§¡¸m©ó·Å«×ºû«ù 4 ¢J ¥H¤U¤§§NÂèú¼Ë½c¤º¡C¼Ë«~¸g§¡½è¡]§¡½è®É©óµLµß¾Þ§@¥x¤W¶i¦æ¡A»P¼Ë«~±µÄ²¤§ª««~§¡¸g±þµß³B²z¡A¥H´î¤Ö¾Þ§@¹Lµ{¤§¦Ã¬V¡^«á¡A¨Ñ¶J¦s¤Î¸ÕÅç¤ÀªR¡C
¤G.áÂäθÑá±ø¥ó
¼Ë«~¤À§O¸m©ó ¡Ð3±0.5 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J±0.5 ¢J ¤U¶J¦s¡A¥t¤@³¡¤À¼Ë«~«h¸m©ó ¡Ð30 ¢J ¤Uáµ²¡A«Ý¨ä¤¤¤ß·Å«×¬° ¡Ð18 ¢J «á¡A¦A²¾¦Ü ¡Ð18 ¢J ¤U§@ªø´ÁáÂáF¼Ë«~ÀË´ú«e§¡¸g 25 ¢J ªº¬y¤ô¸Ñá³B²z¡C
¤T.¤ÀªR¶µ¥Ø¤Î¤èªk
(¤@)ªí±ÂH«×¡]Apparent viscosity; cps¡^¡GÂÇ CVR-20¡]Tokimec Inc., Japan¡^ÂH«×p´ú©w¡C
(¤G)¿B«×¡G¨Ì Wakamaku et al.¡]1983¡^¤èªk´ú©w¡C
(¤T)·»¸Ñ«×¡G¨ÌYªQµ¥¡]1981¡^¤èªkµy¥[×§ï¦Ó´ú±o¡C¨ú¼Ë«~ 10 g ¥[¤J 1 M ¹ÆQ·»²G 90 g ²V¦X¦¨§¡¤Ã·»²G¡A´ú©w¨ä Whatman No.42 Âo¯È©â®ð¹LÂo«e¡B«á°®ª«¶q¤§¤ñ¡A¥H¦Ê¤À²vªí¥Ü¤§¡C
¹LÂo«á¤§°®ª«¶q
¡@¡@·»¸Ñ«×¡]¢H¡^¡×¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¡Ñ100¢H
¡@¡@¡@¡@
¹LÂo«e¤§°®ª«¶q
(¥|)¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¡G¨Ì Cotterill et al.¡]1976¡^¤§¤èªk´ú©w¡C
(¤)¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¡G¨Ì§õ¡]1990¡^¤§¤èªk´ú©w¡C
(¤»)pH È¡G¨Ì A.O.A.C¡]1984¡^¤èªk´ú©w¡C
(¤C)Á`¥Íµß¼Æ¡G¨Ì¤¤°ê°ê®a¼Ð·Ç¡]CNS.3452, 1972¡^¤§¼Ð·Ç¥¥×°ö¾iªk´ú©w¡C
(¤K)¤j¸z±ìµß¸s¡]ÄÝ¡^¡G¨Ì¤¤°ê°ê®a¼Ð·Ç¡]CNS.10951, 1984¡^¤§¤j¸z±ìµßÀËÅçªk´ú©w¡C
(¤E)¨Fªù¤óµß¡G¨Ì¤¤°ê°ê®a¼Ð·Ç¡]CNS.10952, 1984¡^¤§¨Fªù¤óµßÀËÅçªk´ú©w¡C
¥|.®üºø³J¿|¸ÕÅç
¨Ì¤U¦C°t¤è¥ý±N¸Ñᤧ³J¶À²G¡B¿}¤ÎÆQ¸m©ó²V¦X²Ú¤¤¡A¥HÅͩվ¹°ª³t¥´¦ÜÀã©Êµoªw¡A¥[¤J¿z§¡¤§Äѯ»¤Îµo¯»¡A¦A±N²æ¯×¨Å¯»·»©ó¤ô¤¤¥[¤J²V¦X¡A²V§¡¤§Äѽk¡]batter¡^¸m©óªø¤è¦æ§Î¯N½L¤¤¡A¸g 205 ¢J¡B20 ¤ÀÄÁ¯M°ö«á¨ú¥X˸m§N«o¡C
(¤@)Åé¿n´ú©w¡G¨Ì±i¡]1986¡^¤§ºØ¤l¨ú¥Nªk¡]seed replace method¡^´ú©w¡C±N˸m§N«o¤§³J¿|¤W¤èªÅ¶¡¸Ëº¡ªã¤l¡]mustard seed¡^¡AµM«á±Nªã¤l²¾¤J¶qµ©¤¤À˵ø¨äÅé¿n¡A¦A±N¯N½LÅé¿n´î¥hªã¤lÅé¿n§Y±o³J¿|Åé¿n¡C
(¤G)¦â¿A¡G¨Ï¥Î¦â®tp¡]Drlang Micro Color, Typ-Nr LMG501, Germany¡^´ú©w®üºø³J¿|¤§ L.a.b. È¡C
A. ©ú«×¡]lightness¡^¡GL Ȭ°©ú«×¡A¨äÈ·U¤jªí¥Ü·U©ú«G¡C
B. ¦â¬Û¡]hue¡^¡GHue¡×tan-1¡]b/a¡^¡F¨ä¤¤ a ¬°¬õ¦â«×¡Ab ¬°¶À¦â«×¡C
(¤T)µw«×¡G¥Hª«©Ê´ú©w»ö¡]Fudoh Rheometer NRM-2010J-CW, Japan¡^¡A®MÀYª½®| 30 mm¡AÀ£¤O 3 kg¡AÀ£¤J²`«× 25 mm¡A¼Ë«~·Å«× 25±1 ¢J µ¥±ø´ú©w¤§¡C
| ì ®Æ | ¥Î¶q¡]g¡^ | ¦Ê¤À¤ñ¡]¢H¡^ |
| ³J ¶À ²G ¿} ÆQ §Cµ¬Äѯ» µo ¯» ²æ¯×¥¤¯» »] ÃH ¤ô |
100 80 1.4 100 2 5 33 |
31.11 24.89 0.44 31.11 0.62 1.56 10.27 |
¤.²Îp¤ÀªR
¥H²Îp¤ÀªR¨t²Î¡]Statistical analysis system, SAS, 1987¡^®M¸Ëµ{¦¡§@²Îp¤ÀªR¡A¨Ã¨Ï¥Î¤@¯ë½u©Ê¼Ò¦¡¶i¦æÅܤè¤ÀªR¡A¤ñ¸û¨ä®t²§©Ê¡C
µ²ªG»P°Q½×
¤@.²z¤Æ¾Ç»P¾÷¯à¯S©Ê¤§ÅܤÆ
(¤@)ªí±ÂH«×
³J¶À©ó ¡Ð18 ¢J ¤UáÂëá¡A¨äªí±ÂH«×¼@¼W¦Ó²£¥Í¾®½¦¤Æ²{¶H¡]Cotterill et al., 1977¡F±iµ¥¡A1983¡^¡C¹Ï 1 ªí¥Ü³¡¤Àáµ²·Å«×©óáÂôÁ¶¡¤§ªí±ÂH«×ÅܤƱ¡§Î¡A¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J áÂóB²zªÌ©ó¶JÂôÁ¶¡¨äªí±ÂH«×¤Ï¦Ó¦³¤U°ÁͶաA¡Ð6 ¢J áÂę̂äªí±ÂH«×¼W¥[¤£¦ü ¡Ð18 ¢J ªÌ¼@¯P¡A¦ý¦b¶J¦s 2 ¶g«á¥iµo²{¶}©l¦³¾®½¦§@¥Î²£¥Í¡C
(¤G)¿B«×¡B·»¸Ñ«×¤Î¨Å¤Æ©Ê
¥Ñ¹Ï 2 Åã¥Ü¡A¡Ð3 ¢J áÂę̂ä¿B«×ÀH¶JÂîɶ¡ªº©µªø¦Ó¤U°¡F¡Ð6 ¢J ³B²z²Õ«h¦b 10 ¶g¤§áÂôÁ¶¡¨ä¿B«×µL©úÅãÅܤơF¡Ð18 ¢J ³B²z²Õ«hÀH¶JÂîɶ¡¤§©µªø¦Ó¿B«×¼W¥[¡C¦b·»¸Ñ«×¤è±¡A¡Ð3 ¢J ³B²z²Õ¦b¶JÂôÁ¶¡¨ä·»¸Ñ«×µL©úÅãÅܤơA¡Ð6 ¢J¡B¡Ð18 ¢J ³B²z²Õ«hÀH¶JÂîɶ¡©µªø¦Ó¤U°¡A¨ä¤¤¥H ¡Ð18 ¢J ªÌ³Ì¬°ÅãµÛ¡]ªí 1¡^¡C¦báÂôÁ¶¡¡AÀH·Å«×¤U°¦Ó¨Ï¤£·»©Êª«½è¼W¥[¡A¦]¦¹¾ÉP¿B«×¤W¤É¤Î·»¸Ñ«×¤U°¡]Sato and Takagaki, 1976; Herald and Smith, 1989¡^¡A¦Ó ¡Ð3 ¢J ¦báÂôÁ¶¡¤§¿B«×¤U°¡A¥B¦ñÀHªí±ÂH«×¥ç¦³¤U°ÁͶաA¦¹¥ç¥i¯à¦]¤£·»©Êª«½è§ïÅÜ©ÒP¡A¦ý¨ä³y¦¨¤§ì¦]«h¶·¶i¤@¨B±´°Q¡C
¦b¨Å¤Æ¦w©w¤è±¡A³J¶À¦b¤TÓáÂ÷ū׳B²z¤¤¡A¨ä¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê§¡ÀH¶JÂîɶ¡¼W¥[¦Ó¤U°¡A¥BáÂ÷ū׷U§C¨ä¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¨ü·l·UÄY«¡A¨ä¤¤¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J áÂê̯à«O¦³¸û¨Î¤§¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¡A¡Ð18 ¢J áÂà 6 Ó¤ë«á¨ä¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¤U°¬ù 20%¡]ªí 1¡^¡C³J¶À¦b¤TÓáÂ÷ū׳B²z¤¤¡A¡Ð3 ¢J áÂê̦³¸û¦nªº¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¡A¦ý©ó¶JÂÃ¦Ü²Ä 6 ¶g«á«h¦³©úÅã¦H¤Æ²{¶H¡F¡Ð6 ¢J áÂę̂ä¨Å¤Æ®e¶q²¤§C©ó ¡Ð3 ¢J¡A¥B¦P¼Ë¦b²Ä 6 ¶g«á¦³¦H¤Æ±¡§Î²£¥Í¡F¡Ð18 ¢J ¦báÂä@Ó¤ë«á¡A¨ä¨Å¤Æ®e¶q§Y©úÅã¤U°¡]¹Ï 3¡^¡C
¦b³J¶À¾÷¯à¯S©Ê¤§¬ÛÃö¥÷¤¤¡A§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ½è³Q»{¬°¬Oºc¦¨³J¶À¨Å¤Æ¯S©Ê¤§¥Dnª«½è¡]µ©¤«¡A1986¡F¤ô¨¦»P¤¤§ø¡A1988¡^¡A¬G¦]§Ná©Ò²£²£§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ½è¾®¶°¤§½¦¤Æ²{¶H¡A«P¨Ï³J¶À¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¤U°¡A¥B§Ná«áÂH«×¼W¥[¨Ï¤£©öÅͦñ¥H§Î¦¨§¡¤Ã¤§¨Å¿B²G¡A¥ç¬O¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¤U°¤§¥t¤@ì¦]¡A¥B¨ä¨Å¿B²G¤§¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¡A¥Dn¨Ó¦Û§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ½è»P¯×½è³¡¥÷¤§Áäµ²¯à¤O¡]Mizutani, 1985¡^¡AChung and Ferrier¡]1991¡^¥çÃÒ¹ê³J¶À¤§¯×½è³¡¥÷¹ï¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¨ã¦³°^Äm¡A¦ÓªQYµ¥¡]1981¡^µo²{³J¶À¦b ¡Ð18 ¢J ¤U¶JÂôÁ¶¡¨ä¤þ¤GñQ²¸úD¡]TBA¡^ȼW¥[¡A§Y¦³¯×½è®ñ¤Æµo¥Í¡A¬G³J¶À¦báÂôÁ¶¡¨ä§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ½è¤§¯×½è³¡¥÷¾D¨ü®ñ¤Æ¡A¥i¯à¬°¾ÉP¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¤U°¤§ì¦]¡C

| ªí 1.¡@áµ²·Å«×¹ïáÂôÁ¶¡³J¶À·»¸Ñ«×¤Î¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¤§¼vÅT Table 1. Effects of freezing temperature on the solubility and emulsion stability of hen yolk during frozen storage |
|||||||||||
| áÂÃ·Å«× Frozen storage temperature | ÀË ´ú ¶µ ¥Ø Test item | ¶JÂög¼Æ Storage weeks | |||||||||
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | ||
| ¡Ð3 ¢J | ·» ¸Ñ
«× (¢H) ¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê (¢H) |
95.5 98.5 |
97.8 98.2 |
97.4 97.5 |
97.7 97.7 |
97.0 95.6 |
97.1 95.1 |
96.0 93.8 |
¡@ | ¡@ | ¡@ |
| ¡Ð6 ¢J | ·» ¸Ñ
«× (¢H) ¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê (¢H) |
95.5 98.5 |
94.8 96.3 |
93.4 95.5 |
94.7 94.8 |
94.0 94.2 |
93.8 92.1 |
93.1 88.2 |
¡@ | ¡@ | ¡@ |
| ¡Ð18 ¢J | ·» ¸Ñ
«× (¢H) ¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê (¢H) |
95.5 98.5 |
NT NT |
80.5 82.3 |
NT NT |
80.1 80.5 |
NT NT |
79.8 78.7 |
78.3 77.3 |
75.2 75.2 |
74.6 74.6 |
| NT¡G¥¼ÀË´ú¡C | |||||||||||

(¥|)pH È
¡Ð6 ¢J »P ¡Ð18 ¢J ¦báÂôÁ¶¡ pH Ȳ¤¬°¤U°¡A¦ýÅܤƤ£¤j¡A¦Ó ¡Ð3 ¢J ¦báÂôÁ¶¡«h¨Ï pH Ȧ³¸û©úÅã¤U°¤§ÁͶա]ªí 2¡^¡CÃQ¡]1991¡^¥çµo²{¥þ³J¡B³J¶À¤Î³J¥Õ¦b§NÂá]15¡B10¡B5 ¢J¡^´Á¶¡¨ä pH Ȧ³¤U°ÁͶաA¥B¥H¥þ³J¤Î³J¶À¸û¬°©úÅã¡CPike and Peng¡]1988¡^»{¬°³J¶À¤¤¯×½è®ñ¤Æ±N«P¨Ï³J¥Õ½è³¡¤ÀÅܩʤαY¸Ñ¡A¦Ó¯×³J¥Õ½è¤§ºc³y¬°ºû«ù·sÂA³J¶À¤¤¨Å¤Æ¦w©w¤§¥Dnª«½è¡C¦AªÌ¡A¯×½è¤§®ñ¤Æ»P pH Ȧ³¤@t¬ÛÃö¡A§Y pH ȸû§C±¡ªp«h¸û©ö®ñ¤Æ¡A¬G³J¶À¤§¯×½è¤ñ¥þ³J©Î³J¥Õ©ö©ó®ñ¤Æ¡AHan and Liston¡]1988¡^¦b¬ã¨s§Náµ±¸H³½¦×®É¥çµo²{¦³ÁC¯×½èªº¤ô¸Ñ¤ÏÀ³²£¥Í¡A¬G¦báÂôÁ¶¡¥i¯à¥Ñ©ó¯×½è©Î¯×³J¥Õ½è¤ô¸Ñ®ñ¤Æ©Ò²£¥Í¤§ÁC»Ä¡B¯×ªÕ»Äµ¥´åÂ÷»Ä¼W¥[¡A¦Ó«P¨Ï³J¶À pH ȧe½wºC¤U°¡A¥B¦b ¡Ð3 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J ¶JÂÃ¦Ü²Ä 6 ¶g®É¨äµß¼Æ¤w°ª¹F 106 CFU/ml¡A¥ç¥i¯à¨Ï pH ȤU°¤§¥t¤@n¯À¡C
| ªí 2.¡@³J¶À¦b¤£¦P·Å«×áÂôÁ¶¡¤§
pH ÈÅÜ¤Æ Table 2. The pH value of hen yolk during frozen storage at different temperature |
||||||||||
| áÂÃ·Å«× Frozen storage temperature | ¶J Âà ¶g ¼Æ Storage weeks | |||||||||
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | |
| ¡Ð 3 ¢J ¡Ð 6 ¢J ¡Ð18 ¢J |
6.32 6.32 6.32 |
6.10 6.26 NT |
6.04 6.18 6.27 |
6.02 6.16 NT |
6.01 6.13 6.14 |
6.01 6.11 NT |
5.98 6.11 6.16 |
¡@ ¡@ 6.15 |
¡@ ¡@ 6.14 |
¡@ ¡@ 6.14 |
| NT¡G¥¼ÀË´ú¡C | ||||||||||
¤G.·L¥Íª«¾Ç«~½è¤§ÅܤÆ
¹Ï 4 Åã¥Ü ¡Ð3 ¢J ¤Î ¡Ð6 ¢J áÂÃ¦Ü²Ä 6 ¶g®É¨äÁ`¥Íµß¼Æ§¡¹F 106 CFU/ml ¥H¤W¡A¦¹¨âºØ·Å«×³B²z¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J ¦báÂôÁ¶¡¦³¸û°ªªºµß¼ÆÅܤơF¦Ó ¡Ð18 ¢J ³B²z²Õ«h¦³©úÅ㪺§íµß®ÄªG¡A¥B¦báÂäGÓ¤ë«á¨äµß¼Æ§¡§C©ó 103 CFU/ml¡C¾ÉP±Ä¶°¼Ë«~¤§ªìµß¼Æ¹L°ªªºì¦]¬°¥»¸ÕÅ礧±Ä¼Ë¤u§@¦b 6¡ã7 ¤ë¶¡¶i¦æ¡A¦¹®É®ð·Å°ª©ö©ó²Óµß´þªø©ÒP¡CMoats¡]1981¡^»{¬°²G³J¤u¼t¤§¾÷±ñ³]³Æ¬Oºc¦¨²G³J·L¥Íª«¦Ã¬V¤§«n¨Ó·½¡AÃQ¡]1991¡^¥ç¹êÅçÅã¥Ü¤u¼t¤§¥´³J¾¹¤W¥iÀË¥X«Ü°ªªºµß¼Æ¡A©Ò¥H¾÷±ñ³]³Æªº¦Ã¬V¥i¯à¬O¾ÉPªìµß¼Æ¹L°ªªº¥t¤@ì¦]¡C¦b¤j¸z±ìµß¸sÀË´ú¤è±¡A©Ò±Ä¶°¤§¼Ë«~¨ä¤j¸z±ìµß¸s§¡¦³«Ü°ªªºÀË¥X¼Æ¡A¦Ó¸g¤TºØ·Å«×áÂë᧡¦³§í¨î¤j¸z±ìµß¸s¥Íªø¤§®ÄªG¡A¨ÃÀHáÂ÷ūתº¤U°¦Ó®ÄªG·U¨Î¡C±Ä¶°¤§³J¶À¼Ë«~¥ç§¡¦³¨Fªù¤óµß³QÀË¥X¡A¦b¥H¤TºØ·Å«×³B²z¦P¼Ë¦a¹ï¨Fªù¤óµß¦³§í¨î§@¥Î¡AáÂëáÀË´ú§¡§e³±©Ê¤ÏÀ³¡]ªí3¡^¡C
¤T.³J¿|¸ÕÅç
(¤@)©ú«×¡]L value¡^
¡Ð3 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J ³B²z¤§§Ná³J¶À©ó 6 ¶gáÂôÁ¶¡¨ä©Ò»s§@®üºø³J¿|¤§ L ȨõL©úÅãÅܤơA¦Ó ¡Ð18 ¢J áÂôÁ¶¡©Ò»s§@®üºø³J¿|¨ä L ȤU°¡]¹Ï 5¡BA¡^¡C¦¹¤D¦]§C·Å§Ná¨Ï³J¶Àµo¥Í¾®½¦¤Æ¡A¦Ó¦b¸Ñá«á©Ò»s§@¤§®üºø³J¿|¨ä²Õ´¥X²{³\¦h¤Õ¬}¡Aªí±Åܱo¸û¬°²ÊÀê¡A¦]¦Ó´î¤Ö¹ï¥ú½u¤§¤Ï®g¡A¦¹¥i¯à¬° L ȤU°¤§ì¦]¡C
(¤G)¦â¬Û¡]Hue¡Fb/a È¡^
¦UáÂóB²z²Õ¦báÂà 1 Ó¤ë«á¡A¨ä»s§@®üºø³J¿|¤§ b/a §¡¤U°¡F¡Ð18 ¢J ³B²z²Õ¨ä b/a ȧeÅãµÛ¤U°¡]¹Ï 5¡BB¡^¡C¥Ð©Òµ¥¡]1974¡^»{¬°¹«~¤§§NáÅܦâ¤D¦]¨ä³J¥Õ½èÅܩʩÒP¡A°£¦¹¤§¥~¡AáÂôÁ¶¡¯×½è®ñ¤Æ©Ò²£¥Í¤§æó°ò¡]carbonyl group¡^»P¹«~¤¤Ói°ò¡]amino group¡^²£¥Í¤§±ö¯Ç¤ÏÀ³¡]Maillard reaction¡^¥ç¥i¯à³y¦¨ b/a ȤU°¤§ì¦]¡]Robert and John, 1982¡FSaltemarch and Labuza, 1982¡^¡C
(¤T)µw«×
¤£¦P·Å«×áÂóJ¶À¨ä»s§@®üºø³J¿|¤§µw«×§¡ÀHáÂîɶ¡¼W¥[¦Ó¦³¤W¤ÉÁͶա]¹Ï 6¡BA¡^¡A¨ä¤¤ ¡Ð18 ¢J áÂóJ¶À©Ò»s§@®üºø³J¿|¤§µw«×ÅãµÛ°ª©ó¨ä¥L¨âºØáÂ÷ūסC¦¹¤D¦]áÂóB²z«á³J¶À¨Å¤Æ©Ê¨ü·l¡A¨Ï¯M°ö³J¿|¤§©µ®i©Ê®ø¥¢¥HPµw«×¼W¥[¡]Palmer et al., 1969¡^¡C
(¥|)Åé¿n
»s§@³J¿|¤§Åé¿n¥çÀHáÂîɶ¡ªº©µªø¦Ó¤U°¡]¹Ï 6¡BB¡^¡C¡Ð3 ¢J¡B¡Ð6 ¢J áÂȩ̂e¥½w¤U°¡A¤×¥H ¡Ð3 ¢J ³B²zªÌ¦b¶JÂëe¥|¶g¨ä©Ò¦Ü§@¤§®üºø³J¿|§¡¯àºû«ù²z·Qªº³J¿|Åé¿n¡F¡Ð18 ¢J ³B²zªÌ«h¨ä³J¿|Åé¿nÅãµÛ´î¤Ö¡C³J¶À¤§°_ªw©Ê¥Dn¨Ó¦Û§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ½è¡]Kamat et al., 1973¡^¡A¦ÓáÂéҤް_§C±K«×¯×³J¥Õ¤§¾®¶°²{¶H¨Ï¨ä°_ªw©Ê¨ü·l¤ÎÂH«×¼W¥[¡A¨Ï¤£©ö¥´µo°_ªw¥HP¼vÅT¯M°ö«á¤§³J¿|Åé¿n¡C

¥|.¦UÀË´úȤ§¬ÛÃö©Ê
¦b¦UÀË´úȤ§¬ÛÃö©Ê¤¤¡]ªí 4¡^¡Aªí±ÂH«×»P¿B«×¶¡§eÅãµÛ¥¿¬ÛÃö¡A¦Ó·»¸Ñ«×¤Î¿B«×¶¡´ú§e·¥ÅãµÛ¤§t¬ÛÃö¡Aȱoª`·Nªº¬O·»¸Ñ«×»P¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¤Î¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¤§¶¡¦³¤@¥¿¬ÛÃö¦s¦b¡A¦¹¦]³J¶À§Ná¾®½¦©Ò¤Þ°_¤§¥i·»©Ê³J¥Õ½è´î¤Ö¡A¨Ï¿B«×¼W¥[¤Î·»¸Ñ«×¤U°P³J¶À¨Å¤Æ©Ê¨ü·l¡A¥B¥Ñ©ó·»¸Ñ«×»P¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¶¡¦s¦b¤@·¥ÅãµÛ¤§¥¿¬ÛÃö¡A¬G¥i±À´ú·»¸Ñ«×¹ï¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê¤ñ¨Å¤Æ®e¶qªº¼vÅT§ó¬°«n¡C¦AªÌ¡A¡Ð3 ¢J¡A¡Ð6 ¢J áÂä§³J¶À¡A¶JÂÃ¦Ü²Ä 6 ¶g®ÉÁ`¥Íµß¼Æ¤w°ª¹F 106 CFU/ml¡A¦¹®É¨Å¤Æ®e¶q¤Î¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Êµ¥¾÷¯à¯S©Ê¥ç¦P®É¦³ÅãµÛ¦H¤Æ±¡§Î¡A¦¹¬ÛÃö©Ê¥ç¤ÏÀ³¦b³J¿|¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¤W¡C
¤.µ²½×
¬°´î¤Ö§C·Å¹ï³J¶À¥\¯à©Ê©Ò³y¦¨¤§¶Ë®`¡A¤Î¦]À³²G³Jµu´Á¡]4 ¶g¡^¶J¦s§Y¨Ñ§Q¥Î¡A¦P®É¦b¸`¬Ù¯à·½¦¨¥»¤§¸gÀÙ¦Ò¶q¤U¡A¡Ð3 ¢J ¤£¥¢¬°¤@¥i¨Ñ°Ñ¦Ò¤§¿ï¾Ü¡C
| ªí 3.¡@³J¶À¦b¤£¦P·Å«×áÂôÁ¶¡¤§³Ì¤j¥i¯à¤j¸zµß¼Æ¤Î¨Fªù¤óµßÀË´ú Table 3. The most probable number (MPN) of Coliform and the Salmonella examination of hen yolk during frozen storage at different temperatures |
|||||||||||
| áÂÃ·Å«× Frozen storage temperature | ÀË´ú¶µ¥ØTest item | ¶J Âà ¶g ¼Æ Storage weeks | |||||||||
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | ||
| ¡Ð3 ¢J | Coliform Salmonella |
¡Ö1100 ¡Ï |
¡Ö1100 ¡Ð |
462 ¡Ð |
239 ¡Ð |
149 ¡Ð |
7.4 ¡Ð |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
¡@ | ¡@ | ¡@ |
| ¡Ð6 ¢J | Coliform Salmonella |
¡Ö1100 ¡Ï |
1098 ¡@ |
239 ¡Ð |
42 ¡Ð |
11.2 ¡Ð |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
¡@ | ¡@ | ¡@ |
| ¡Ð18 ¢J | Coliform Salmonella |
¡Ö1100 ¡Ï |
NT NT |
7.4 ¡Ð |
NT NT |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
NT NT |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
¡Õ03 ¡Ð |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
¡Õ0.3 ¡Ð |
| * ¦h»ù¥»Åé¡]O¡^§Ü¦å²M¾®¶°¸ÕÅç¡C Polyvalent somatic (O) antiserum agglutination test. ** NT¡G¥¼ÀË´ú¡F¡Ð¡G¥¼¾®¶°¡F¡Ï¡G¾®¶° |
|||||||||||

| ªí 4.¡@¦UÀË´ú¶µ¥Ø¶¡¤§¬ÛÃö Table 4. Correlation among the item of the test |
|||||||
| ÀË ´ú ¶µ ¥ØItem | pH | ªí±ÂH«×Apparent viscosity | ¿B «×Turbidity | ·» ¸Ñ «×Solubility | ¨Å ¤Æ ®e ¶qEmulsifying capacity | ¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©ÊEmulsifying stability | Á` ¥Í µß ¼Æ Total viable counts |
| pH ¡@ ªí±ÂH«× Apparent viscosity ¿B«× Turbidity ·»¸Ñ«× Solubility ¨Å¤Æ®e¶q Emulsifying capacity ¨Å¤Æ¦w©w©Ê Emulsifying stability Á`¥Íµß¼Æ Total viable counts |
-- | -0.30503a 0.0097b --- |
-0.3458 0.0022 0.4561 0.0001 --- |
0.2149 0.0623 -0.1615 0.1783 -0.9508 0.0001 --- |
0.0656 0.5732 -0.19892 0.0976 0.3136 0.0058 0.3982 0.0004 --- |
0.2681 0.0192 -0.5712 0.0001 -0.8284 0.0001 0.8082 0.0001 0.5937 0.0001 --- |
0.0361 0.7569 -0.1178 0.3280 -0.1825 0.1145 0.0661 0.1145 -0.3607 0.0014 0.0982 0.3984 --- |
| a¡G¥Öº¸´Ë¬ÛÃö«Y¼Æ¡C Pearson correlation coefficient. b¡G¾÷²v¡C Probability. |
|||||||
°Ñ¦Ò¤åÄm
¤¤°ê°ê®a¼Ð·Ç¡A1972¡CCNS 3452 Á`¥Íµß¼ÆÀËÅçªk¡C
¤¤°ê°ê®a¼Ð·Ç¡A1984¡CCNS 10951 ¤j¸z±ìµßÀËÅçªk¡ACNS 10952 ¨Fªù¤óµßÀËÅçªk¡C
§õ¥¿©¾¡B±i³Óµ½¡C1990¡C¥þ³J¯»»s³y¤§¬ã¨s¡C¤¤¯b·|»x 19(3-4)¡G159¡ã172¡C
±i³Óµ½¡B³¯¥ßªv¡B§d§BÁJ¡B¶À·u·×¡C1983¡C§Ná³J»s³y¤§¬ã¨s £S. ¯}·lÂû³J»s³y§Ná³J¤§À˰Q¡C¤¤¯b·|»x 12(1-2)¡G69¡ã81¡C
ÃQ§®§Â¡B±i³Óµ½¡C1993¡C²G³J²Óµß¤§Å²©w¡C¤¤¯b·|»x 22(4)¡G455¡ã461¡C
¤s¤º §¡¡C1988¡C¦B·Å¶JÂá]¡Ð3 ¢J¡^«D²z½×©ÊÇyÀ˰QÇ@Çr¡CNew Food Industry 30¡G23¡ã28.
¤ô¨¦¥O¤l¡B¤¤§ø¨}¡C1988¡C§Z¶À§C±KÇæ³J¥Õ½è¤§ÇU¨Å¤Æ©ÊÇOªº¸ÑªR¡CNew Food Industry 30¡G49¡ã58¡C
¥Ð©Ò¦N©¾¡BÃè÷¥¿¥Í¡B¥[ÃõϦ¡BÄ夫ªÚ¤H¡C1974¡C§Nṫ~ÇËÇïÇÅÇÒǿǫ¡Cpp. 132¡ã147¡C¥úµY¡C
YªQ§Q¨k¡B¦õÃîõ¡B»ôÃêڤl¡C1981¡CÂû§Z§Z¶À¤§¨Å¤Æ¯S©ÊÇR¤ÎÇWÇ@áµ²ÆðÇoÇ[áµ²«O¦s
ÇU¼vÅT¡C¤é¹¤u»x 28¡G247¡ã252¡C
µ©¤«ª¾¤v¡C1986¡CÂû§Z§Z¶À¦¨¤ÀÇ»ÇïÇÍÇ«½è¤§¤À§O¯S©ÊÆðÇoÇZ¾÷¯à¯S©ÊÇRÃöÇ@Çr¬ã¨s¡C¤é¹¤u»x 33¡G349¡ã357¡C
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official Method of Analysis pp. 940, 943, 963. Arlington, VA.
Chung, S. L. and L. K. Feerier. 1991. Partial lipid extraction of egg yolk powder-effects on emulsifying properties and soluble protein fraction. J. Food Sci. 56¡G1255¡ã1258.
Cotterill, O. J., J. Glauert and H. J. Bassett. 1976. Emulsifying properties of salt yolk after pasteurization and storage. Poultry Sci. 55¡G544¡ã548.
Han, T. J. and J. Liston. 1988. Correction between lipid peroxidation and phospholipid hydrolysis in frozen fish muscle. Food Sci. 53¡G1917¡ã1919.
Herald, T. J. and D. M. Smith. 1989. Functional properties and composition of liquid whole egg proteins as influenced by pasteurization and frozen storage. Poultry Sci. 45¡G35¡ã38.
Kamat, V. B., G. A. Lawrence, M. D. Barratt, A. Dark, R. B. Leslie, G. G. Skipley and J. M. Stubbs. 1972. Physical studies of egg yolk low density lipoproteins. Chem. Phys. Lipids 9¡G1¡ã25.
Mizutani, R. and R. Nakaura. 1985. Physical state of the dispersed phase of emulsion prepare with egg yolk low density lipoprotein and bovine serum albumin. J. Food Sci. 50¡G1632¡ã1645.
Moats, W. A. 1981. Factors affecting bacterial loads on shells of commercially washing eggs. Poultry Sci. 60¡G2084¡ã2090.
Palmer, H. H., K. Ijichi, H. Roff and S. Redfern. 1969. Sugared egg yolk: Effects of pasteurization and freezing on preformation and viscocity. Food Technol. 23¡G1581¡ã1604.
Robert, E. F. and R. W. John. 1982. The maillard reaction and its prevention. pp. 47¡ã62. ACS Symposium series 206. Washington D. C.
Saltmarch, M. and T. P. Labuza. 1982. Non-enzymatic browning via the maillard reaction in foods. Diabetes 31¡G3¡ã7.
Saari, A., W. D. Powire and O. Fennema. 1964. Influence of freezing egg yolk plasma on the properties of low density lipoprotein. J. Food Sci. 29¡G762¡ã765.
Sato, Y. and Y. Takagaki. 1976. Influnce of thawing rate aging temperature on viscosity of freezing-thawed yolk and low density lipoprotein. Agric. Biol. Chem. 40¡G49¡ã55.
Wakamatu, T., Y. Sato and Y. Saito. 1983. On sodium chloride action in the gelation process of low density lipoprotein (LDL) from hen egg yolk. J. Food Sci. 48¡G501¡ã512.
¡@
¡@
Effects of Freezing Storage Temperature on the Quality of Hen Yolk
Yi-Chao Chen(1)(3) and Hsi-Shan Chang(2)
Received Nov. 17, 1997; Accepted Dec. 19, 1997
ABSTRACT
The study was conducted to investigate the effects of different freezing temperatures (¡Ð3 ¢J, ¡Ð6 ¢J, ¡Ð18 ¢J) on the functional properties and microbial variation of liquid yolk in storage period. The viscosity of hen yolk increased with the decrease in frozen temperature and the increase in stored time. Simultaneously, the increase in turbidity and the decrease in solubility were observed. The pH values decreased gently on all treatments, and the ¡Ð3 ¢J treatment was more significant than the others. Among three freezing temperatures, the ¡Ð3 ¢J treatment could maintain the best emulsifying capacity and the ¡Ð18 ¢J did the worst during the first 4 weeks of storage. With regard to the emulsion stability, the ¡Ð18 ¢J treatment was the worst after being frozen and the descent was about 20%. The ¡Ð3 ¢J, ¡Ð6 ¢J treatments maintained the better emulsion stability than the ¡Ð18 ¢J¡Abut both still decreased slightly. On the whole ,the ¡Ð3 ¢J would maintain satisfying functional properties in the first 4 weeks of frozen storage. The total viable counts (TVC) of the ¡Ð3 ¢J, ¡Ð6 ¢J treatments were over 106 CFU/ml after frozen storage of up to 6 weeks. And the TVC of the ¡Ð18 ¢J treatment was still below 103 CFU/ml after 2 months frozen storage. The growth of Coliform was inhibited on all frozen treatments, and the effect of inhibition was enhanced with the decrease in frozen temperature and the increase in frozen stored time. The Samonella test was negative on every treatment. The sponge cake test revealed that the volume and texture of the cake made from the ¡Ð18 ¢J frozen hen yolk were lowered and were in poor quality. Both the volume and texture of the cake made from the ¡Ð3 ¢J, ¡Ð6 ¢J frozen hen yolks were satisfactory.¡]Key Words¡GFreezing temperature, Freezing storage time, Hen yolk, Quality¡^
¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w
(1)Department of Animal products processing, Taiwan
Livestock Research institute, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C.
(2)Department of Animal Science, National Chung- Hsing University, Taichung,
Taiwan, R.O.C.
(3)Corresponding author.
¤¤°ê¯bªª¾Ç·|·|»x ²Ä27¨÷ ²Ä3´Á 421¡ã431, 1998